Back to Case Studies

Thatched cottage fire: £229,000 buildings, contents and alternative accommodation claim

Location Hampshire

Customer Miss Richardson

Mary Richardson’s beautiful 17th century thatched cottage was completely destroyed after a fire caused by the wood-burning stove. The cottage, which was a listed building in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, was her pride and joy.

Miss Richardson had recently been made redundant and was working as a temp, so would not be paid if she took time off work to handle the insurance claim. She also recognised that, despite several years working in the insurance industry, this was likely to be a complicated claim because of the unique heritage of the cottage. Following discussions, she therefore appointed Morgan Clark to handle the claim.

The claim 

The greatest challenge faced was to comply with the complicated demands of both the Conservation Officer and modern building regulations. For example, the Conservation Officer insisted that the original wattle-and-daub walls were re-instated; the local building inspector stipulated that the chimneys had to be higher than before for safety reasons. This would not be a straightforward restoration project.

Morgan Clark brought in specialist surveyors who drew up a comprehensive specification to satisfy both parties. However this took the extent of claim far beyond like-for-like replacement covered by the policy. In addition, Miss Richardson would need far longer in temporary accommodation while this complex project was carried out.

Morgan Clark put together a detailed claim and started negotiations with the insurer.

The results 

After protracted negotiations:

  • The cottage was restored to its former glory.
  • The full claim of £229,000, covering building and contents and beyond like-for-like, was accepted by the insurance company.
  • Both the Conversation Officer and local building inspectors agreed to the specification and the work was carried out exactly as Miss Richardson wanted.
  • Her extended time in temporary accommodation was fully covered.
  • As part of the refurbishment, a new kitchen and bathroom was installed.

More Case Studies

Manchester

Fire Claims

Fire and smoke damage in rental property: £80,000 claim

"When a fire broke out in Mr Seedat’s rental property in Manchester, a full refurbishment was needed. The fire started from a drier, which was installed by the tenant living in the property at the time. The accident led to fire damage in the utility ro..."

Cambridge

Fire Claims

Underinsurance issues overcome by Morgan Clark following fire damage ...

"Mr and Mrs Hampshire suffered a fire at their thatched cottage, which started in the middle of the night when the family were asleep. The accidental fire was caused by a lighter being ignited, which resulted in blankets and pillows catching fire and sad..."

Surrey

Fire Claims

Fire in three-bedroom house: £92,000 buildings claim plus Landlord&#...

"Mr & Mrs B, who live in Surrey, own a three-bedroomed house nearby which they rent out. One afternoon they received a call from the tenants telling them the house was on fire. When they arrived 15 minutes later, the fire brigade had put the fire out..."

Darlington, County Durham

Fire Claims

Successful fire claim in rental property leads to further referrals

"Mr Knee owns a three-bed property in County Durham, which he rents out. When a tenant accidentally set a chip pan alight and started a fire in the property, he was left facing a damaged house and a large fire insurance claim. The fire caused extensive d..."

North Yorkshire

Fire Claims

Extensive fire damage in North Yorkshire: £250,000 insurance claim

"After an electrical fault within the roof space started a fire, Mr and Mrs Hall needed to claim for extensive fire and smoke damage on their well-appointed, 4-bedroom property. The damage to the couple’s North Yorkshire house was extensive; eight fire..."

Somerset

Fire Claims

Underinsurance on a property fire claim: A settlement increase of ove...

"Mr Schroder experienced a fire at his home in Somerset and the thatched property suffered extensive damage. Mr Schroder faced underinsurance of 66%, which the Insurers proposed applying to the settlement of the claim based on generic figures given by th..."